GPU inference optimization

New hardware won't fix a stack that wastes half its compute.

If you self-host AI models, you're likely overpaying 30 to 60% for the same output. We're a boutique studio that finds the waste in your serving layer, proves it in dollars, and cuts it. Before you spend a cent with us.

Read-only, fixed-price, and backed by a 3x-or-free guarantee.

inference_audit — acme_ai.reportSAMPLE
47%recoverable
CURRENT SPEND$92,000/mo
↓ after tuning
OPTIMIZED$48,900/mo
Idle GPU capacity
$18.4k
Naive batching
$11.9k
FP16 → FP8 quant
$7.2k
Oversized GPU
$5.6k
// Illustrative sample. Your report shows your real numbers, measured on your stack.
01 Our thesis
Self-hosting was the right call. Most teams are just running it wrong, and it's not their fault.

Inference performance is nobody's full-time job. The open-source defaults were tuned for the average workload, not yours. So GPUs sit at 30% utilization, batching leaves throughput on the table, and the bill climbs every quarter while everyone assumes it's just the cost of doing AI.

It isn't. It's a configuration problem wearing a budget problem's clothes. And the only people who can fix it properly are the ones who build inference engines for a living. There aren't many of them, and they're all employed inside Big Tech. That's the gap we exist to fill.

02 The math

The same workload, three ways.

A voice agent serving 2 billion tokens a month. Identical model, identical quality. The only variable is who tuned the serving layer.

// MONTHLY COST · 2B TOKENS/MO
$8.0kHosted API
$3.2kSelf-host · default
$1.4kMaralabs-tuned
Hosted APISelf-host · defaultSelf-host · Maralabs-tuned
Cost per 1M tokens$4.00$1.60$0.70
GPU utilizationn/a~30%~70%
Monthly cost$8,000$3,200$1,400
You own the stackNoYesYes

// Illustrative figures. Even after you self-host, tuning the serving layer cuts the bill another ~56%. That delta is the whole business.

03 Estimate your waste

Put your own number on it.

Most teams recover 30 to 60% once the serving layer is tuned. Drag your monthly spend to see the range.

Your monthly GPU spend$60,000
$10k$500k
POTENTIAL MONTHLY SAVINGS
$18,000 – $36,000
ANNUALIZED
$216,000 – $432,000
// Illustrative, based on typical 30–60% recovery. Your real number comes from the audit.Get your real number
04 Who we are

Built by an engineer who does this at the kernel level.

Most "optimization" consultants stop at swapping config flags. That captures the easy wins and leaves the rest. The hard savings live one layer down, in work most teams have never had access to:

  • Continuous batching & schedulingReshaping how requests share a GPU, not just turning batching on.
  • Quantization done with evalsFP8 / INT4 with quality measured before and after, so nothing ships blind.
  • Kernel fusion & CUDA-level workCutting the round-trips inside the GPU that generic setups never touch.
  • Right-sizing model to hardwareMatching the model to the cheapest GPU that still hits your latency target.
Technical co-founder

A staff-level systems engineer

18 years of performance-critical C++, working on the op libraries, JIT compilers and GPU kernels that AI models actually run on. This is his day job on an AI accelerator stack, not a weekend skill.

op librariesJIT compilersCUDA kernelsvLLM · SGLangTensorRT-LLM
Vendor-neutral by design. We optimize the stack you already run. We're not renting you a cloud.
05 The audit

Two weeks, read-only, fixed price.

You hand us read-only access. We hand back a map of exactly where your GPU spend is leaking, what each fix is worth in dollars, and how hard it is. No changes to your product. No six-month project.

WEEK 1

Baseline

We measure your real cost per token, GPU utilization and traffic shape. We touch nothing.

WEEK 2

Findings & readout

Every leak located and sized in dollars, a prioritized roadmap, and a 60-minute readout with your team.

AFTER

Your call

Implement with us, hand the map to your own engineers, or walk away with it. No lock-in either way.

The guarantee. If we don't find at least 3x the audit's cost in annualized savings, the audit is free.
· The deliverable
  • Baseline of your real cost per token and GPU utilization
  • Every leak located: batching, KV cache, quantization, scheduling, GPU fit
  • Each opportunity sized in dollars and in effort
  • Prioritized roadmap: this week, this month, this quarter
  • A 60-minute readout with you and your engineers
06 Why Maralabs

Weigh it against the alternatives.

Do nothingHire in-houseManaged platformMaralabs audit
Time to value3–6 monthsWeeks to migrate2 weeks
Keeps your current stackYesYesNo, you migrateYes
Vendor lock-inNoneNoneHighNone
Cost modelRising bill$200k+/yr salaryMargin on every tokenFixed · 3x-or-free
Best whenSpend is tinyYou need it full-time, foreverYou want someone else to run itYou want the wins without the headcount or lock-in
07 Who it's for

A fit if you're already spending real money on GPUs.

Self-hosting open models$25k+ / month on GPUs Voice AI · latency is the productVideo & image generation at scale Healthcare · legal · finance · compliance self-hosting Only using hosted APIsUnder $25k / month

If you're under $25k a month or purely on hosted APIs, you probably don't need us yet, and we'll say so. We qualify hard because the guarantee only works when the savings are real.

08 FAQ

The questions engineers actually ask.

Our engineers already optimized this.

Most teams capture the obvious wins, and if yours has, the audit confirms it in writing and costs you nothing under the guarantee. The real question is your measured GPU utilization. When teams can't answer that at once, there's almost always double-digit spend hiding in the serving layer.

Won't cheaper GPUs or falling API prices fix this on their own?

Cost per token has fallen sharply for years while total bills keep rising, because usage outgrows the discount. And faster hardware running the same misconfigured stack wastes just as much, at a higher hourly rate. The waste is in how the stack is run, not the price of the chip.

Will quantization hurt output quality?

Done properly it's imperceptible, and we never ask you to take our word for it. We measure quality with evals before and after every change. If a change moves your quality bar, it doesn't ship. We optimize cost, not your product's behavior.

How much access do you need?

The audit is read-only. We need to see your serving configuration and a representative traffic profile. We don't touch production, we don't change your product, and nothing is implemented without your sign-off.

How are you different from an inference provider like Baseten or Together?

We're vendor-neutral. We optimize the stack you already run, wherever you run it. We're not renting you a cloud or moving you onto our platform, so our only incentive is finding you savings on your own infrastructure.

What does it cost?

The fit check is free. The audit is a fixed price we agree up front, sized to your setup, and backed by the 3x-or-free guarantee. We qualify first because below a certain GPU spend the numbers don't work in your favor yet, and we'll tell you that honestly.

Find out what your stack is really costing you.

Tell us what you run and what you spend. We reply within two business days with a straight read. Worst case, you learn your stack is already tight.

Email us
hello@maralabs.io